Dave's Writing Guidelines
Over the years I have collected a few thoughts on the preparation of research
papers, and listed some of the most common mistakes that I find in people's
papers (mine too!). So I list them here for easy reference.
Format:
-
Double spaced, with extra-large margins. That makes it easier for
me to mark up with comments.
-
Font size 11pt preferred over 10 or 12.
Structure:
While these comments should nothing new, I've found it helpful to remember
the following things. They largely apply to expository writing,
of the type we encounter in this course.
-
Your paper draft should have a title, authors, date, revision number, and
abstract.
-
A typical structure is
-
Introduction
-
Background
-
(description of your system)
-
Experiments
-
Results
-
Related Work
-
Conclusion (or Summary, but note those are different things)
-
Future Work
-
Acknowledgements
-
References
Usage:
Here are some things that I commonly find a need to mark on student papers
(and my own too!). I tend to mark only the first one or two occurrences
of any given mistake in any given paper. I don't try to explain all
of them fully here; see some of the books below for specific advice about
English usage. Day's books are particularly good for learning the
conventions used in scientific writing. Here are a few of the most
common mistakes that I have noticed. I number them because I may
refer to these numbers when marking your paper. If you see me mention
SW12, that's a reference to Strunk
and White, section 12.
-
Check your spelling! You're writing the paper on a computer,
a computer that can check your spelling. Use the spell checker!
It can catch many typos.
-
Hyphenate compound words that are used as an adjective. For
example, in "open-book exam", the phrase "open book" is used as an adjective
for the noun "exam." These hyphens are used much like parentheses;
"open-book exam" is read like "((open book) exam), whereas "open book exam"
is read "(open (book exam))", not the likely meaning.
-
Be careful how you use "which" and "that". "Which"
nearly always follows a comma, because it is used to add information, whereas
"that" is used to qualify:
-
The ball, which is red, fell down the hole.
-
The ball that is red fell down the hole.
In the first sentence, there is only one ball involved, and we mention
almost as an aside that it is a red ball. In the second sentence,
there are presumably many balls involved, but it is the red ball that fell
down the hole. The following sentence is ungrammatical:
-
The ball which is red fell down the hole.
-
Avoid the passive sentence structure. It obscures the subject
of the sentence, and leads to ambiguity. See Dupré 1, SW11.
-
Do not use contractions in formal writing.
-
Avoid verbosity (see SW13):
-
"In order to..." becomes "To..."
-
"At this point in time" becomes "At this time"
-
"a number of" becomes "several"
-
Do not underline words and phrases. For emphasis, foreign
words, etc., use italics.
-
The abbreviations "i.e.", "e.g.", "etc.", "vs.",
are indeed abbreviations and thus should have periods as shown. Of
those, "i.e.", "e.g.", should always be followed by a comma, as should
"etc." when in the middle of the sentence. (Why? because they replace
"that is", "for example", and "and so forth", which are always delimited
by commas (SW3).)
At the end of a sentence I prefer to use "and so forth" rather than "etc.."
-
If you want to mention a URL...
-
do not place it inline, in the text. Put it in a footnote, or a reference
at the end of the paper. A footnote is nice because the font is generally
smaller, and it starts on a new line, so the URL can generally fit in one
line and not mess up the line-wrapping in the text. Plus, few people
actually want to read a URL, though they still might want it handy
for reference.
-
Avoid URLs that refer to CGI scripts, as these tend to have a short lifetime.
-
If the URL is for a publication (book, article, magazine, news story),
give a full traditional citation of the publication itself , but include
the URL for the reader's convenience.
-
Do not end a clause or sentence with a preposition (with, for,
to, from, under, on, in, and so forth). See Dupré 60.
-
"This" should almost always be followed by a noun: instead of saying
"this is red", you should be more specific with "this ball is red."
If you leave it out, your reader may mentally insert a different noun than
you had in mind... things that are not ambiguous to you can be ambiguous
to your reader.
-
It is rarely useful to use the word "very". How much hotter
than "hot" is "very hot"? This story may be apocryphal, but Mark
Twain once said that he would just replace "very" with "damn" everywhere,
and then the editor would surely take them all out.
-
"However" should (usually) not begin a sentence: rewrite "However,
I found that the red ball had been missing for weeks" as "I found, however,
that the red ball had been missing for weeks". Then, note that "however"
should be surrounded by commas. It is ok for it to be at the end
of a sentence, however.
-
It is rarely appropriate to say "whether or not"; usually you should
just say "whether". If you do use "whether or not", don't spread
the words across the sentence. See Dupré 73.
-
When writing about general interconnected computer networks, call it the
internet
(not capitalized). When writing about the specific public internet that
is based on the IP protocol, call it the Internet. The Internet
is an instance of all internets. Unfortunately it is common, though
technically incorrect, to equate the Internet and the World-Wide Web (which
is also capitalized, please note). The WWW is a subset of the Internet.
-
When referring to other parts of your paper, use present tense.
That is, do not say, "This paper will discuss...", say, "This paper discusses...".
Similarly, say, "The argument above proves that..." rather than "The argument
above proved that...". Why? Because, despite the fact that
your reader is reading through the paper, over time, the paper stands complete,
in the present. The argument not only proved, but still proves...
Recommended books:
-
Robert A. Day. Scientific English: a guide for scientists and other
professionals. Oryx Press, 1992.
-
Robert A. Day. How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper.
Oryx Press, Phoenix, AZ, 5th edition, 1998.
-
Lyn Dupré. Bugs in Writing: A Guide to Debugging Your Prose.
Addison Wesley, 1995.
-
William Strunk Jr. and E. B. White. The
Elements of Style. MacMillan, third edition, 1979. (A fourth
edition was released in 1999.)
-
Dartmouth's own Sources:
Their Use and Acknowledgment.