Dartmouth PCS-TR89-142

	Dartmouth College Computer Science Technical Report series	CS home TR home TR search TR listserv
By author:	A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z
By number:	2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1993, 1992, 1991, 1990, 1989, 1988, 1987, 1986

A Comparison of Consistency Control Protocols
Michael Goldweber, Donald B. Johnson, Larry Raab
Dartmouth PCS-TR89-142

Abstract:

In this paper we analyze three protocols for maintaining the mutual consistency of replicated objects in a distributed computing environment and compare their performance with that of an oracle protocol whose performance is optimal. We examine these protocols, two dynamic protocols and the majority consensus protocol, via simulations using two measures of availability. The analysis shows that the dynamic protocols, under realistic assumptions, do not perform significantly better than the static voting scheme. Finally we demonstrate that none of these approaches perform as well as our oracle protocol which is shown to be an upper bound on availability.

PDF (692KB)

Bibliographic citation for this report: [plain text] [BIB] [BibTeX] [Refer]

Or copy and paste:
Michael Goldweber, Donald B. Johnson, and Larry Raab, "A Comparison of Consistency Control Protocols." Dartmouth Computer Science Technical Report PCS-TR89-142, 1989.

Want to be notified about new tech reports? Join our mailing list.

Want to search our technical reports?

Want us to mail you a paper copy of a report? Send your address and the TR number to reports AT cs.dartmouth.edu

Copyright notice: The documents contained in this server are included by the contributing authors as a means to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work on a non-commercial basis. Copyright and all rights therein are maintained by the authors or by other copyright holders, notwithstanding that they have offered their works here electronically. It is understood that all persons copying this information will adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. These works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.